'The Politics of US Occupation'

'The documentary open what really happened in the Philippines during the the Statesn traffic. It highlighted, around specially, the political and historic renders during the snip.\nContrary to what our textbooks on Philippine business relationship say, the the Statesn occupation was far from peaceable. on that point was violence in all full general anatomys burning at the stake of villages, massacres and abuse of women. However, these were non all of the atrocities did by the Americans during that time. at that place was the regularity of water redress a peace method of the Americans, non only to take a leak information, scarcely it was a equivalent a form of torture to fightds the Filipinos exhibit of what could happen if they political platform to rebel against the American occupation. \nA nonher recognize was that of the misleading historic background of the strengthened ties surrounded by the Philippines and America. The ties between the two countries wer e genuinely established during the Philippine-American war of 1899, and not the morsel World War. Thus, whenever the American occupation would be mentioned to the Filipino hatful that lived during that time of turmoil, it would activate a traumatic emotional chemical reaction because of the anomalies that took place during that period. \nThis may be dark to most Filipinos, but Theodore Roosevelt, the U.S. president at that time of the American occupation in the Philippines, congratulated an American general for the massacres that took place in the Philippines. No, the massacres were not to clear a peaceful Philippine America relationship; those entire measures were taken because America wanted the Philippines to be one of its colonies (which, apparently worked until this very day). There was heavy discrepancy of the Filipinos: the Americans did not take away the Filipinos as equals and called them niggers ; and because of this, the Americans did not have a hard time t o shoot the Filipinos like rabbits . \nAnother issue in dubiousness was the legality  of water boarding or the water...'